ASH regularly produces educational webinars, video series, and podcasts that feature presentations by experts in the field, cover current information on how to best diagnose and care for patients, and topical discussion on issues relevant to hematology. This content is free to stream on ASH On Demand.
As a medical professional, there are times over the course of your career when you will need to advocate for yourself, your team or maybe even an entire organization. How you approach your negotiation may determine your success. In this webinar, speakers will discuss the basics of negotiations, how to prepare, gender gaps in negotiations, and how to reach the best possible agreement for all parties.
ASH and The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS) Clinical Trial Support Center (CTSC) have collaborated to enhance access to LLS’s free service providing clinical trials navigation and support to health care professionals, and patients with blood cancer and their families. Many cancer clinical trials continue to enroll patients, and many patients are seeking help finding trials closer to home to avoid traveling. ASH member physicians and their care teams, along with patients and caregivers, receive one-on-one support from LLS's CTSC Nurse Navigators and have direct access to them for the duration of the search and enrollment process, and while patients are on the trials. This webinar will highlight the process of referring patients through the ASH portal and showcase the ease of working with LLS’s nurse navigators.
Moderator: Chancellor E Donald, MD (Chair, ASH Committee on Practice, Tulane University School of Medicine)
Matthew Cheung, MD, FRCPC, SM (Odette Cancer Centre/University of Toronto)
In this webinar, Dr. Donna Luff will provide an overview of Grounded Theory qualitative research and its uses for medical education research. She will introduce the aims and processes that define Grounded Theory and consider the applicability of the approach within medical education research, drawing on examples from the literature.
Results of robust clinical trials are needed to inform management of and prevent coagulopathies in people with COVID-19. Such studies have been organized within the National Institutes of Health’s Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions (ACTIV) program. The ACTIV-4 master protocol will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of varying types of blood thinners to treat adults diagnosed with COVID-19. Currently there are three adaptive platform clinical trials within ACTIV-4 that aim to prevent, treat, and address COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (CAC), or clotting, as well as help understand the effects of CAC across three patient populations: inpatient, outpatient, and convalescent. The adaptive nature of the platform will allow a seamless transition to studies that will test multi-regimen anticoagulation approaches. On this webinar, a leader of the three ACTIV-4 studies will review the goal of the study and the research protocol as well as discuss how sites can become involved in the study. The leaders will also address how the studies intersect with each other as well as other ongoing trials in COVID-19 coagulopathies.
Moderator: Lisa M. Baumann Kreuziger, MD, Versiti and Medical College of Wisconsin
W. Keith Hoots, MD; Director, Division of Blood Diseases and Resources, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health
Jeffrey Berger, MD; Co-Principal Investigator, ACTIV-4A; NYU Langone Health
Jean M. Connors, MD; Principal Investigator, ACTIV-4B; Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Thomas L. Ortel, MD, PhD; Study Chair, ACTIV-4C; Duke University Medical Center
Von Willebrand Disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder with wide variability in clinical phenotype. Arriving at an accurate diagnosis can be challenging due to variability in test accuracy, diagnostic thresholds, and access to specialty centers. Management of VWD may involve use of von Willebrand factor concentrate for the prevention and treatment of bleeding as well as adjunctive therapies such as desmopressin and antifibrinolytics. ASH has developed guidelines on diagnosis and management of VWD with the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF), World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) and the University of Kansas Medical Center. Educational Objectives: • Review methods for development of clinical practice guidelines • Describe diagnostic pathway for evaluation of von Willebrand disease • Discuss diagnostic thresholds and subtype classification of VWD • Discuss utility of prophylaxis for patients with severe bleeding in VWD • Review management approach for heavy menstrual bleeding and postpartum hemorrhage
Moderator: Paula James, MD, Queen’s University
Moderator: Veronica Flood, MD, Versiti Blood Research Institute
Reem Mustafa, MD, MPH, PhD, University of Kansas Medical Center
Nathan Connell, MD, MPH, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Jeroen Eikenboom, MD, PhD, Leiden University Medical Center
Angela Weyand, MD, University of Michigan Medical School
Within medicine, faculty are commonly asked to write letters of recommendations for colleagues and students. Presented by Dr. Rakesh Mehta, this webinar covers strategies to help faculty organize and develop a strong letter of recommendation. Incorporating participant input, Dr. Mehta will explore the criteria that best communicate a candidate’s strengths and make a candidate stand out. Additionally, Dr. Mehta will shed light on newly developing literature on the implicit biases that can be transmitted through these letters, and will touch on various ways for faculty to avoid potential pitfalls in this area. Lastly, Dr. Mehta will lead attendees in developing an outline of a truly excellent letter of recommendation.
*Updated video with audio will be added once received. Thank you for your patience.
Rakesh Mehta, MD, Indiana University School of Medicine
According to the National Cancer Institute, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is defined as medical products and practices that are not part of standard medical care. Alternative medicine, such as a specialized diet or other naturopathy, is used in lieu of standard medicine while complementary medicine, such as using acupuncture to help lessen some side effects of cancer treatment, is used along with standard medical treatments. While some CAM therapies, after careful evaluation, have been found to be safe and effective, research on others has been slow due to issues such as time, funding, and the ability to identify willing institutions and researchers. Additionally, some CAM therapies, such as medical marijuana, have run into regulatory hurdles, and there is little communication about CAM use among patients, CAM providers, and hematologists. Nevertheless, CAM is common among hematology patients, who, for example, use the analgesic properties of medical marijuana for cancer and sickle cell disease, but also for many who use these unconventional therapies to gain hope and improve quality of life. This session will provide information about CAM therapies that may be discussed by patients with their hematologist. Additionally, the session will address the most common questions physicians hear from their patients about CAM therapies and how to conduct a constructive conversation between the physician and patient.
Moderator: Chancellor E Donald, MD, Chair, ASH Committee on Practice, Tulane University School of Medicine
This webinar provides education on how to evaluate SCD patients in the ED presenting with symptoms concerning for COVID-19 and/or complications of SCD, with SCD-specific considerations for evaluation and treatment. This webinar was hosted by the American Society of Hematology, the American College of Emergency Physicians, and the Emergency Department Sickle Cell Care Coalition.
Evaluation and assessment comprise core components of medical education. While evaluation seeks to determine the overall caliber of a learner’s performance or an educational curriculum, assessment is a dynamic, active process that seeks to improve learning. Educational frameworks such as Kirkpatrick’s pyramid for evaluating educational outcomes, and Miller’s pyramid for assessing clinical competence, can guide learners and instructors in creating and optimizing curricula in order to improve learner competence and engagement. This session of the ASH Medical Educators Institute will focus on the principles of evaluation and assessment in medical education, will review the major types of evaluation and assessment tools, and will discuss how these tools may be used to design and optimize educational curricula in hematology.
This year's ASH Grassroots Network Session provides a forum for interested members to: • Hear in-depth analysis of the recent election and learn about potential impacts on health care and hematology by the new Congress and Administration. • Learn how to participate in ASH’s advocacy efforts, communicate with Congress and the White House, become effective advocates for hematology, and discuss the Society’s legislative and regulatory priorities. • Discover the Society’s 2020 advocacy accomplishments and get a preview of the Society’s 2021 advocacy agenda. The featured speaker is Luke Hartig, the Senior Vice President for Product Strategy and Consulting at National Journal, a non-partisan policy news and current events organization in Washington, DC. Mr. Hartig will present a post-election analysis and his predictions about how the outcome of the election may affect issues impacting hematology research and practice, including access to and coverage of health care and funding for biomedical research.
Moderator: Alan Rosmarin, MD, Chair, ASH Committee on Government Affairs, Deputy Editor, UpToDate, Professor, University of Massachusetts Medical School
Keynote Speaker: Luke Hartig, Senior Vice President for Product Strategy and Consulting, National Journal